Saturday, June 10, 2017

No full and final settlement after 8 months since resignation

Query - I was working with a software company for 3 years. I resigned the company 8 months ago. I received the relieving letter and experience letter. The HR told me that full and final settlement would be done after 2 months according to company policy. But it's almost 8 months and no settlement has been done. They say full and final settlements of previous employees are still pending and they will be considered first. Every time the HR gives some funny reason as if it's my concern that the previous cases are pending. Can I send a notice to the company legally? Is the company ignoring any law by delaying the FNF settlement?

Reply

Withholding of terminal benefits (payments due at the time of full and final settlement) by the company (employer) is illegal as well as unjustified. In case of delay, an employee can legally claim an appropriate interest upon the delayed payments. It may be noted that there can be no such “policy” in terms of which the company can withhold your terminal benefits even for 2 months. In case any such “policy” exists, then that “policy” by itself is illegal and unenforceable in law. It may further be noted that pendency of clearance of payments of previous employees is no reason, much less a valid reason, to withhold your payments to which you are legally entitled too. You can, therefore, take a legal action against the company by sending a legal notice through a lawyer followed by a civil suit for recovery.

You may also like to know that Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in catena of cases has repeatedly emphasized the position that terminal benefits are no longer matters of any bounty to be distributed by an employer. Terminal benefits are valuable rights acquired by an employee and are, in fact, property in the hands of an employer. It has also been repeatedly held by the Hon’ble Courts that any delay in settlement and disbursement thereof has to be viewed seriously and dealt with severely by imposing penalty in the form of payment of interest. [For your reading - State of Kerala vs M. Padmanabhan Nair [(1985) I LLJ 530 SC]

Hope the query stands satisfied. For any further clarification / query please call / contact the undersigned.

Thanks & regards,
Anuj Aggarwal
Advocate
Mob - 9891403206

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Special Education Teachers are entitled to interest on delayed payment of salary

Central Administrative Tribunal – Held, the Special Education Teachers, working in the schools run by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi, are entitled to interest on delayed payment of salary at the prevalent rate of interest applicable on GPF account of employees – Sarvesh Dixit & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [CAT - O.A. No. 1334/2016, Decided on 16.05.2016]
http://www.advocateanujaggarwal.com/home.php

Anuj Aggarwal
Advocate
Mob - 9891403206

In case the facts are not in dispute then it is inappropriate to remand the matter to the executives for deciding the representation

Delhi High Court – In case the facts are not in dispute then it is inappropriate to remand the matter to the executives for deciding the representation – Order passed by the CAT set aside and the matter remanded back for decision on merits – Nisha Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. [W. P. (C) 8874/2015; decided on 21.09.2015]



Retrospective regularization in service of Malis

Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) - Retrospective regularization in service – Employees (Malis) held entitled to full salary of a permanent employee during the period of their enforced unemployment (termination from service) - Once a terminated workman is reinstated in service, he is deemed to be in service for all intent and purposes – No recovery can be made from Malis (class IV employees) – Order passed by the MCD directing recovery from the Malis set aside – Dinesh & Ors. Vs. East Delhi Municipal Corporation [O.A No.3349/2013; decided on 20.08.2016]



Employees of North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) are entitled to Hospital Patient Care Allowance (HPCA)

Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) - Technical Assistants / Technicians / OT Technicians working in the hospitals of North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) are entitled to Hospital Patient Care Allowance (HPCA) – Order passed by the NDMC to discontinue and recover the payment of HPCA from its employees set aside by the CAT – Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs. NDMC & Ors. [O.A. No. 470/2016; decided on 30.08.2016]

Anuj Aggarwal
Advocate
Mob - 9891403206

Dismissal of constable on the ground of unauthorized absence

Supreme Court – Dismissal of constable on the ground of unauthorized absence – Held, disproportionate to the gravity of alleged misconduct – Directed re-employment as a fresh recruit - Prathvi Raj Sharma vs. State of U.P. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.3647 of 2015, arising out of SLP(C) No.18131/2014; decided on April 13, 2015]


Appointment to the post of Primary Teacher in KVS

Delhi High Court (DB) - Appointment to the post of Primary Teacher in KVS – A candidate who has scored 50% marks in best 5 subjects in class 12th Examination is eligible for appointment - Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Vs. Rohit & Anr. [Writ Petition (C) No. 6342/2015; Date of decision: 18th October, 2016]


Anuj Aggarwal
Advocate
Mob - 9891403206
Email – anujaggarwal1984@gmail.com

http://www.advocateanujaggarwal.com/home.php